Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Flipped! Turning Learning on its Head

By Violet Dickson 
Cluster Specialist for Arts, AV, Technology, & Communications 

On a recent flight, I reached for a copy of Spirit, Southwest Airlines’ publication available to airline passengers for their in-flight reading pleasure. I found it interesting that the August issue was entitled, “New School: How the digital revolution is turning learning upside down”. The cover story, “Flipped Out”, by Jennifer Miller, was all about a new paradigm for classroom learning that’s been getting lots of buzz lately. It’s called different names, but primarily it’s being referred to as flipped learning. 
 
The term “flipped” refers to the concept of switching the work completed at home with work typically done in the classroom. In a flipped classroom, the teacher uses technology to screencast instructional videos (aka vodcasting) to students at home. So some of what used to be done in class (lecture/direct instruction) is now done at home via the Internet, and what used to be assigned for homework is now done in class, with a greater focus on project-based activities and more student/teacher interaction. 
 
Flipped learning is the brainchild of Jonathan Bergmann and Aaron Sams, who are credited with pioneering the use of screencasting in education. According to Bergmann and Sams, flipped learning is more than simply video-taping teacher instruction for students to watch at home. It’s more about determining the best use of in-class time and the best way to engage students in the learning process, whether in-class or at home.
 
Flipped learning offers lots of promise for bringing 21st century skills into the classroom and also for creating a more student-centered approach to learning. However, in discussing flipped learning with teachers, I’ve discovered there are many opinions on the subject, and at times, even a heated debate over whether to flip or not to flip. Some teachers even tell me they’ve shared the concept with their students and gotten a negative response. What I’m finding, however, is that many of these teachers do not have a clear understanding of what flipped learning is and is not. 
 
When people hear the term, flipped learning, most think that it’s all about video-taping every lesson for students to watch at home and providing no instruction or structure in the classroom. Teachers who have tried this method have found that the “new” wears off rather quickly, and students eventually become just as bored watching videos as they did with traditional homework. 
 
Teachers who have embraced the concepts of flipped learning agree that there are many misconceptions, and it takes time to make changes in instructional strategies. Many of these teachers admit to making mistakes along the way when it comes to creating a flipped classroom. Fortunately for us, some of these “forerunner” teachers are now providing valuable pointers, like sign posts along the route, for those of us who are just now setting out on this journey. Below is a brief synopsis of what successful “flipped” teachers have to say about what is and is not flipped learning and their suggestions for the best way to create a flipped classroom.
 
What Flipped Learning is NOT:  
  1. It is not a synonym for videos or for replacing teachers with videos.
  2. It is not creating an online course.
  3. It is not unstructured.
  4. It is not about students spending all of their time working at computers in isolation.
 
What a Flipped Classroom IS: 
  1. A blending of direct instruction with constructivist learning. 
  2. A way to increase personal interaction between teachers and students. 
  3. A place where students take responsibility for their own learning. 
  4. A place where all lessons can be archived for future reference or reteaching.
 
Suggestions for making the change to flipped learning: 
  1. The term, “video” does not mean you should set-up a video camera and record every lesson. Instead, make a short screencast that simply captures your computer screen (for slide presentations, websites, etc). Include your voice and a small webcam of your face. (Directions for making a screencast are in the book by Bergmann and Sams and also in an article from Educational Leadership – see below.) 
  2. Start small. Don’t try to screencast every lesson. Start with 1 lesson per week and work up. By the end of the school year, you’ll have a library of 30-50 archived lessons. 
  3. Make them short. 7 – 15 minute screencasts are usually adequate. Try not to make any screencasts longer than 15 minutes. 
  4. Include activities or assignments for students to complete. This connects instruction with application and also provides a way to check that the student completed the video.  For example: An instructional video on the Pythagorean theory might include an assignment where students walk around their bedroom and snap pictures of right angles. Back in the classroom, they would use those images, along with their textbooks, to solve for the hypotenuse.
  5. Use materials you already have on hand, such as slide presentations that go with particular lessons.
  6. You do not have to create all of your own videos. You can also incorporate the use of online instructional videos that are available on nearly every subject as well as online virtual tours of famous places.
  7.  Allow students to work at their own pace, but keep a record of progress and set a final deadline for all work from that unit to be completed. This allows students time to go back and review previous screencasts and resubmit work if necessary.
  8. Allow students without Internet access at home to watch the screencasts at school and complete any “pre-class” assignments before beginning any “in-class” projects. This is easily accomplished since screencasts are short and students work at their own pace.
In addition to the above suggestions, there are also many great resources available to help teachers make the switch to flipped learning (see below). 
 
Flipped learning is not a silver bullet. But teachers who are paving the way in this new instructional design are finding that, with a flipped classroom, they have greater flexibility, students have more time to complete projects, teachers are better able to meet the needs of all of their students, and there is more face-to-face class time to focus on the important stuff. 
 
For more information on flipped learning: 
  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Bergmann, J., Overmyer, J., & Wilie, B. (2012). The flipped class: Myth vs. reality. The Daily Riff. Retrieved from http://www.thedailyriff.com/articles/the-flipped-class-conversation-689.php
  • Educational Vodcasting: Flipping the Classroom. Retrieved from http://www.flippedclassroom.com/
  • Flipped Learning Network. Retrieved from http://flippedlearning.org/FLN
  • Miller, J. (2013). Flipped out. Spirit: Southwest Airlines (August), 72-81. Sams, A., & Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip your students’ learning. Educational leadership, 70 (6), 16-20.

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Why Web 2.0 is Good for Teaching and Learning

by Amber O'Casey
Cluster Specialist
Government & Public Administration
Law, Public Safety, Corrections & Security


 What is Web 2.0?
Web 2.0 is the next step for the World Wide Web. It includes webpages and applications (apps) that encourage community and collaboration by allowing anyone to contribute content. It is about social participation, including networking/collaborating focused on common interests or on shared projects (Clowes, 2007). Some examples of Web 2.0 tools are wikis, social networking sites (i.e. Facebook, Myspace, etc.), content hosting services (i.e. YouTube, Dropbox, etc.), podcasting, and blogs. 
 
Why use Web 2.0 in the classroom?
Web 2.0 applications can enhance the learning experiences of students by allowing them to utilize their creative potential while simultaneously developing marketable skills. Most Web 2.0 applications are available at no-cost and user-friendly. Here are some of the benefits of using Web 2.0:
 
  • Helps students to access, generate and store prior/new knowledge (Boateng, 2010) 
  • Creates interaction between students (Boateng, 2010) 
  • Enables knowledge sharing (Boateng, 2010) 
  • Increases course satisfaction (Ajjan, 2009) 
  • Improves learning and writing ability (Ajjan, 2009) 
  • Increases interaction with other students and teachers (Ajjan, 2009) 
  • Creates a context that is relevant (Benjamin, 2008) 
  • Demonstrates how the world of conducting business has changed (Benjamin, 2008) 
  • Illustrates how we must embrace the developing communities and networks on the web (Benjamin, 2008)  
How do you implement Web 2.0 in a way that facilitates learning? 
There are numerous ways to implement Web 2.0 to facilitate learning. Here are a few examples: 
 
Next generation presentation tools (EDUCAUSE, 2010a) 
  • Take presentations from the desktop and move them to the Internet 
  • Allow collaboration between multiple authors  
  • Use nonlinear branching that illustrates the various connections within the information which provides flexibility and promotes audience participation 
  • Support dynamic teaching and learning  
  • Encourage a new presentation paradigm that includes audience collaboration, multimedia integration, and cross-platform viewing  
  • Include

Prezi, SlideShare, SlideRocket, and Zoho Show 
 
Online team-based learning (EDUCAUSE, 2010b)
  • Is effective for group work by students on project- or problem-based assignments
  • Inspires deeper student engagement in the learning process
  • Provides the opportunity to practice and apply collaborative skills (EDUCAUSE, 2010b) 
Online media editing (EDUCAUSE, 2010c) 
  • Are cloud-based media editing applications that allow students with a computing device and web access to edit or contribute to media such as video, photographs, and music  
  • Are often provided at no cost 
  • Are cross-platform and device-independent 
  • Allow students to collaborate and create with causal user skills 
  • Include programs such as
YouTube (video-editing and music swap services), Picasa (image editing), and Picnik (image editing) (EDUCAUSE, 2010c) 

Works Cited

Ajjan, H. & Hartshorne, R. (2009) Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(3), 183 – 198.

Benjamin, R. I., Birkland, J. L. H., & Wigand, R. T. (2008) Web 2.0 and beyond: implications for electronic commerce, In ICEC '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Electronic commerce, 1 – 5.

Boateng, R., Mbarika, V., & Thomas, C. (2010) When Web 2.0 becomes an organizational learning tool: evaluating Web 2.0 tools, Development and Learning in Organizations, 24(3), 17 – 20.

Clowes, M. (2007). Web 2.0 – the possibilities, Libraries For Nursing Bulletin, 27(2-3), 31 – 41.

EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. (2010a, January). 7 things you should know about next-generation presentation tools. Retrieved from
http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7056.pdf

EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. (2010b, August). 7 things you should know about online team-based learning. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7063.pdf

EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. (2010c, October). 7 things you should know about online media editing. Retrieved from
http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7065.pdf